[E129]
STUDY VI
THE MEDIATOR OF THE ATONEMENT
DAVID'S SON AND DAVID'S LORD
How David's Son--Joseph's Genealogy Through Solomon--Mary's Genealogy
Through Nathan--Abase the High, Exalt the Low--Whence
Christ's Title to be David's Lord--How He was Both Root and Branch
of David--Meaning of His Title, "The Everlasting Father"--How Secured
and How to be Applicable--Who are Children of Christ--The
Church His "Brethren"--Children of the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ.
"Jesus asked them, saying, What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he?
They say unto him, The Son of David. He saith unto them, How then
doth David in spirit [by inspiration] call him Lord, saying, The Lord
[Jehovah] said unto my Lord [adon, master, ruler], Sit thou on my right
hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord
[adon, master] how is he his Son?" Matt. 22:42-45
IT SHOULD be noticed, first of all, that the discussion of
this question does not relate to our Lord's pre-existence, but
merely to his relationship to the human family. He became
related to the human family, as we have seen, by taking our
nature, through his mother Mary. Mary's genealogy, as
traced by Luke, leads back to David, through his son Nathan
(Luke 3:31*), while Joseph's genealogy, as given by
Matthew, traces also back to David, through his son, Solomon.
[E130]
(Matt. 1:6,16) Joseph having accepted Mary as his
wife, and adopted Jesus, her son, as though he were his own
son, this adoption would entitle Jesus to reckon Joseph's
genealogy; but such a tracing back to the family of David
was not necessary, because, as we have seen, his mother
came also of David, by another line.
*Joseph is here styled "the Son of Heli," i.e., the son of Eli, Mary's
father,
by marriage, or legally; or as we would say, son-in-law of Eli. By birth,
Joseph was the son of Jacob, as stated in Matt. 1:16.
But, be it noticed that our Lord's claim to the throne of
Israel does not rest upon his mother's relationship to Joseph,
as some have inferred. On the contrary, had he been
the son of Joseph, he would have been debarred from any
ancestral right to David's throne, because, although David's
successors in the kingdom came through the line of his
son Solomon, and not through the line of his son Nathan,
nevertheless certain scriptures distinctly point out that the
great heir of David's throne should not come through the
royal family line of Solomon. If we shall demonstrate this, it
will be an effectual estoppel of the claims made by some,
that our Lord must have been the son of Joseph, as well as
of Mary. Let us therefore carefully examine this matter.
The divine proposition, clearly stated, was, first, that
unequivocally and unquestionably the great heir of the
throne of the world, the great King of Israel, should come of
David's line. Secondly, it was also declared that he should
come of the line of Solomon, of the reigning family, only
upon certain conditions. If those conditions were complied
with, he would come of that line; if those conditions were
not complied with, he would come of some other line, but in
any event must come through David's line and be both David's
son and David's Lord.
Note the Scriptural statement:
"The Lord hath sworn in truth unto David; he will not
turn him from him: Of the fruit of thy body will I set upon
thy throne. If thy children will keep my covenant, and my testimony
that I shall teach them, their children shall also sit
upon thy throne forevermore." Psa. 132:11,12
"And of all my sons (for God hath given me many sons)
he hath chosen Solomon my son to sit upon the throne of
[E131]
the Kingdom of the Lord over Israel. And he said unto me,
Solomon thy son shall build my house....Moreover, I will
establish his kingdom forever, if he will be constant to do my
statutes and my judgments as at this day." 1 Chron. 28:5-7
"If thy children take heed to their way, to walk before me
in truth, with all their heart and with all their soul, there
shall not fail thee [be cut off from thee, from the throne--
margin] a man from the throne of Israel." 1 Kings 2:4
The promise of the Messianic Kingdom in Solomon's
line, and in the line of his posterity according to the flesh,
is thus made clearly and specifically conditional, contingent
upon a certain faithfulness to the Lord; and by all rules of
interpretation of language, the implication of this is that
unfaithfulness to the Lord would assuredly bar the posterity
of Solomon and his line from the throne of Israel, as related
to the Messianic Kingdom, according to the flesh.
The question therefore arises, Did Solomon and his successors
upon the throne of Israel "take heed to their way, to
walk before me [God] in truth, with all their heart and with
all their soul?" If they did not, they are barred from being
of the ancestral line of the Messiah, according to the flesh.
We must go to the Scriptures to ascertain the answer to
this question. There we find most unmistakably that Solomon
and his royal line failed to walk after the divine precepts.
Hence we know of a surety that that line was cut off
and abandoned from being the Messianic line, and that it
must come through another ancestral line, from David.
Hear the word of the Lord:
"And thou, Solomon, my son, know thou the God of thy
father and serve him with a perfect heart....If thou seek
him he will be found of thee, but if thou forsake him he will
cast thee off forever." 1 Chron. 28:9
"And the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his
heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel....Wherefore
the Lord said unto Solomon, Forasmuch as this is done
of thee and thou hast not kept my covenant and my statutes
which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom
[E132]
from thee....Nevertheless in thy days I will not do
it--for David thy father's sake; but I will rend it out of the
hand of thy son. Howbeit, I will not rend away all the kingdom,
but will give one tribe to thy son, for David my servant's
sake and for Jerusalem's sake which I have chosen."
1 Kings 11:9-13
In harmony with this, the record is that the ten tribes
were rent away from the Solomonic line, directly after Solomon's
death--ten of the tribes never acknowledging allegiance
to Rehoboam, Solomon's son and successor. But let
us hearken to the word of the Lord respecting the tribe of
Judah, and its consort Benjamin, which remained for a
time loyal to the line of Solomon, and thus apparently associated
with the promised antitypical Kingdom, and Messiah,
the great King. The last three kings of Solomon's line
who sat upon his throne were Jehoiakim, his son Jehoiachin
(called also Jekoniah and Coniah), and Zedekiah, Jehoiakim's
brother. Let us mark the testimony of the Lord's
Word against these men, and his assurance that none of
their posterity should ever again sit upon the throne of the
Kingdom of the Lord--actual or typical. We read:
"As I live, saith the Lord, though Coniah the son of
Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the signet upon my right
hand, yet would I pluck thee hence....Is this man Coniah
a despised broken idol? Is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure?
Wherefore are they cast out (he and his seed), and are cast
into a land which they know not? O earth, earth, earth,
hear the word of the Lord: thus saith the Lord, Write ye this
man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for
no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of
David, and ruling any more in Judah." Jer. 22:24-30
"Thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, he
shall have none to sit upon the throne of David." Jer. 36:30
Concerning Zedekiah we read:
"Thou profane and wicked prince of Israel, whose day is
coming, when iniquity shall have an end: Thus saith the
Lord God, Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this
[E133]
shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him
that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it: and it
shall be no more until he come whose right it is; and I will
give it to him." Ezek. 21:25-27
Here the complete overturning of the Solomonic line is
declared: it was the line that was exalted, and which should
thenceforth be debased, while the debased or obscure line
of Nathan, which had never made any pretensions to the
throne, was to be exalted in due time in its representative,
the Messiah, born of Mary, according to the flesh.
Who could ask more positive testimony than this, that
the Messiah could not be expected through the line of Solomon
--all the rights and claims of that line, under divine
promises and conditions, having been forfeited by wickedness
and rebellion against God? Thus the claim that our
Lord must have been the son of Joseph, and thus have inherited
his rights and claims through Joseph, are proven utterly
false, for no man of that line shall ever sit upon the
throne of the Lord.
This changing of the kingdom from the branch of Solomon
to another branch of the house of David is clearly foretold
in other scriptures, as we read, "Behold the day is coming,
saith the Lord, that I will raise unto David A RIGHTEOUS
BRANCH, and a king shall reign and prosper....In his days
Judah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely; and this
is his name that Jehovah proclaimeth him, Our Righteousness."
Jer. 23:6--See Young's Translation.
Mary, the mother of Jesus, seems to have caught this
proper thought, or else was moved to speak by the holy
Spirit prophetically, when she gave utterance to the remarkable
song of thanksgiving quoted by Luke (1:46-55): "He
[God] hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their
heart; he hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted
them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good
things, and the rich he hath sent empty away." Here the
favored family of Solomon's line is contrasted with the humbler
family of Nathan's line. The diadem and crown were
[E134]
removed from Zedekiah, and from the line of Solomon, to
be given to him whose right it is--the Righteous Branch
from the Davidic root.
We have seen how our Lord is the branch, or offspring or
son of David, and the line through which his genealogy is
properly to be traced, and the full accordance of the Scriptures
thereto: let us now see in what respect he was David's
Lord. How could Jesus be both the Son and the Lord of
David?
We answer that he is not David's Lord by reason of anything
that he was as a spirit being before he was "made
flesh," and dwelt amongst us--no more than he was David's
Branch or Son in his prehuman existence. Our Lord Jesus
became David's Lord or superior, as well as "Lord of all"
(Acts 10:36), by reason of the great work which he accomplished
as the Mediator of the Atonement. "To this end
Christ both died and rose and revived, that he might be Lord
both of the dead and living." Rom. 14:9
True, the Logos might properly have been styled a Lord, a
high one in authority, as he is styled a God, a mighty or influential
one.* Likewise the man Christ Jesus, before his
death, might properly be styled a Lord, and was so addressed
by his disciples, as we read, "Ye call me Lord and
Master, and ye do well, for so I am." (John 13:13) As the
special messenger of the Covenant, whom the Father had
sanctified and sent into the world to redeem the world, and
whom the Father honored in every manner, testifying,
"This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased"--it
was eminently proper that all who beheld his glory, as the
glory of an Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and
truth, should reverence him, hear him, obey him, and worship
him--do him homage--as the representative of the Father.
But, as indicated by the Apostle in the text above
[E135]
cited, there was a particular and different sense in which our
Lord Jesus became a Lord or Master by virtue of his death
and resurrection.
*It will be remembered that we are not now discussing the word
"Jehovah,"
so frequently translated "Lord" in the Old Testament. We are
discussing
other words rendered "Lord" as in the text above quoted. "The
Lord [Jehovah] said unto my Lord [adon--my master]. Sit thou on
my right
hand," etc.
This particular sense in which the risen Christ was "Lord
of all"--"Lord both of the dead and the living"--is vitally
connected with his great work as Mediator of the Atonement.
It was for this very purpose that he became a man.
Humanity in its depraved condition, "sold under sin"
through the disobedience of Father Adam, was helpless--
under the dominion of Sin and the sentence of death: and
its deliverance from these evils, in harmony with the divine
law, required that the penalty of Adam entailed upon his
family should be fully met. The race required to be bought
back from sin, and Christ became its purchaser, its owner--
"Lord of all." For this very purpose he left the glory of his
prehuman condition, and became the man Christ Jesus.
And the Scriptural declaration is that he "gave himself a
ransom"--a purchase price--for the race condemned in
Adam. Thus the whole world was "bought with a price, even
the precious blood [life] of Christ."
But though by virtue of his having bought the race, he has,
in the eye of Justice, become its owner, its master, "Lord of
all," he did not purchase the race for the purpose of enslaving
it, but for the very reverse object of setting at liberty
from sin and death all who will accept the gracious gift of
God through him. And the very object of the establishment
of the Messianic Kingdom is that through it may be bestowed
upon the human family the rights and privileges of
the sons of God--lost in Eden, redeemed, bought with a
price, at Calvary. It was to obtain this right to release man
that our Redeemer became the purchaser, owner, Lord of
all. Thus by his death Messiah became David's Lord, because
David was a member of the race purchased with his
precious blood.
"The Root and Offspring of David"
--Rev. 22:16--
Much of the same thought is presented in these our
[E136]
Lord's words to the Church. According to the flesh, our
Lord Jesus was, through his mother, the son, the branch,
the offshoot or offspring of David. It was by virtue of his
sacrifice of his undefiled life that he became the "root" of
David as well as his Lord: for the thought suggested by the
word "root" differs somewhat from that furnished in the
word "Lord." The "root" of David signifies the
origin, source
of life and development of David.
The Scriptures declare that David was "a stem out of
Jesse:" his father therefore was his root, according to natural
generation. When and how did Christ become David's
root or father? We answer, Not before he "was made
flesh"--it was when made flesh that, as the man Jesus, he
became related to Adam's race through his mother. (Heb. 2:14-18)
And in that relationship to the race and to David
he was "branch," not "root." How and when did he become
the "root"? We answer, By the same means and at the same
time that he became David's Lord: the means was his death,
by which he purchased life-rights of Adam and all his race,
including David's; the time was when he was raised from the
dead, Adam's Redeemer, the race's Redeemer and hence
David's Redeemer.
It was therefore not the prehuman Logos nor yet the man
Jesus that was David's Lord and David's Root; but the resurrected
Messiah. When David in spirit (i.e., speaking under
the prophetic spirit or influence) called Jesus Lord,
saying, "Jehovah said unto my Lord [Jesus], Sit thou on my
right hand," etc., the reference was not to the sacrificing
one, "the man Christ Jesus," who had not yet finished his
sacrifice, but to the victor Jesus, the Lord of life and glory,
"the first born from the dead, the prince of the kings of
earth." (Rev. 1:5) It was of this one that Peter said,
"Him
God raised up the third day....He is Lord of all." (Acts 10:36,40)
Of this one also Paul declared that at his second
coming he will display himself as "King of kings and Lord
of lords."* 1 Tim. 6:15
*See page 78.
[E137]
"The Second Adam"
The first "root" or father of the human race, Adam,
failed, because of disobedience to God, to bring forth his
family in his own likeness, the image of God; he not only
failed to give to his posterity everlasting life, but forfeited
his own right to the same, and entailed upon his offspring a
legacy, a heredity of sin, weakness, depravity, death. The
Logos was made flesh, became the man Christ Jesus, in order
that he might be the Second Adam, and take the place of
the first Adam, that he might undo the work of the first
Adam, and give to him and to his race (or so many of them
as will accept it upon the divine terms), life more abundant
everlasting life, under its favorable conditions, lost through
disobedience.
It is a great mistake of some, however, to suppose that
"the man Christ Jesus" was the Second Adam. Oh no! As the
Apostle declares (1 Cor. 15:47), "The second Adam is the
Lord from Heaven"--the Lord who will come from heaven,
and at his second advent assume the office and duties of a
father to the race of Adam, which he redeemed with his
own precious blood at Calvary. The purchase of the race of
Adam from under the sentence of Justice was necessary before
it would be possible for our Lord Jesus to be the Life-giver
or Father of the race: and this great work alone was
accomplished by our Lord at his first advent. He comes, at
his second advent, to lift up mankind by processes of restitution,
and to give eternal life, and all the privileges and
blessings lost through the first Adam. The interim is devoted,
according to the Father's program, to the selection
from amongst the redeemed world of a class whose qualifications
were predestined--that they should all be "copies
of God's dear Son." (Rom. 8:29) This class is variously
called the under-priests of the Royal priesthood, the body
or Church of Christ, and the Bride of Christ, the Lamb's
wife, and joint-heir with him in all the honors and blessings
and service of his Kingdom.
[E138]
Accordingly, the work of the future, the work of the Millennial
Age, the grand object for which Messiah will reign,
is expressed by the word regeneration. The world was generated
once through father Adam, but failed to get life; it
was generated only to sin and its sentence, death. But the
new Father of the race, the second Adam, proposes a general
regeneration. The time of this regeneration, as it shall
become available to the world, is distinctly indicated by
our Lord's words to his disciples to be the Millennial Age.
He said, "Ye that have followed me, in the regeneration
shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of
Israel," etc. The fact that the Church, selected during this
Gospel age, experiences a regeneration, is generally recognized
by Bible students, but many have overlooked the fact
that another and separate regeneration is proposed, and
has been provided for the world of mankind, as a whole:
not that all shall experience the full regeneration, but that
all shall have an opportunity, which, if rightly used, would
lead to full, complete regeneration.
It is well, in this connection, to notice more particularly
the wide distinction between the regeneration of the
Church and the regeneration of the world: in the case of the
Church many are called to the regeneration offered during
this Gospel age, and few are chosen--few experience the full
regeneration to which they are invited--namely, to become
new creatures in Christ Jesus, partakers of the divine nature.
The regeneration provided for the world, as we have
already seen, is not to a new nature, but to a restoration or
restitution of the human nature in its perfection.
And so it is written, "The first Adam was made a living
soul [an animal being], the last Adam a quickening spirit.
However, the spiritual was not first, but the animal--afterwards
the spiritual." (1 Cor. 15:45-47--See Diaglott.)
Verily
our Lord Jesus in the days of his flesh did take hold on or
become identified with the first Adam and his race, through
the seed of Abraham (Heb. 2:16), and was made "lower
than the angels, for the suffering of death...that he by the
[E139]
grace of God might taste death for every man." But having
accomplished that object he was raised from the dead a
partaker of the divine nature, the purchaser of the human
family, but no longer of it--no longer "of the earth
earthy," but the heavenly Lord--the Second Adam, a life-giving
spirit.
The first Adam was the original "root" out of which the
entire human family has been produced, and hence our
Lord Jesus in the flesh, son of Mary, son of David, son of
Abraham, was in the same sense a shoot or branch out of
Adam (but supplied, as we have seen, with an unimpaired
life from above, which still kept him separate from sinners).
It was his sacrifice of himself as the man (in obedience to the
Father's plan) that not only secured his own exaltation to
the divine nature, but purchased to him all the race of
Adam and Adam's right as father or "root" of the race.
Thus by purchasing Adam's place and rights, our Lord is
the Second Adam. As he gave his own human life for that of
Adam, so he sacrificed also the possibilities of a race which
he might have produced in a natural way, for Adam's children
--that he may in due time accept "whosoever will" of
Adam's family as his own children, regenerating them, giving
them everlasting life under reasonable terms. No longer a
"branch," out of the root of Jesse and David, our Lord is a
new root, prepared to give new life and sustenance to mankind
--Adam, Abraham, David and every other member or
branch of the sin-blighted human family who will accept it
on the terms of the "Oath-bound Covenant."
Like the first work of the Lord for his Church of this age
will be his work for all of mankind who will accept it during
the Millennial age. His first work for his Church now is
justification
to life (human life) in harmony with God, in fellowship
with God: the same enjoyed by the perfect man Jesus,
prior to his consecration to death at baptism; and the same
enjoyed by the perfect man Adam before he transgressed--
except that theirs was actual while ours is merely a reckoned
perfection of life. (Hence the statement that we are "justified--
by faith.")
[E140]
Our Lord represents himself and his Church as a grapevine;
and it furnishes us a good illustration of the branch and
root proposition. Adam and his race were the original vine
and branches, attacked by the virus of sin, producing bad
fruit and death. Our Lord Jesus became a new branch, and
was grafted into the Adamic vine, and bore a different kind
of fruit. It is a peculiarity of the grapevine that its branches
may be buried and become roots. So our Lord, the branch
ingrafted upon Adamic stock, was buried, ceased to be a
branch and became a root. His Church during this age are
"branches" in him, and likewise have their "fruit unto
holiness"
(Rom. 6:22) the new life being drawn from him. But
all the branches of this age are required not only to "bear
much fruit" as branches, as he did, but also like him eventually
to be buried and with him become parts of the root
that during the Millennial age shall invigorate and sustain
the regenerated human race.
The fallen root, Adam (with the first Eve, his helpmate,)
generated the human family in bondage to sin and death;
the Second Adam, Christ, (with his Bride and helpmate),
having bought the rights of the first as well as him and his
race, will be prepared to regenerate all the willing and
obedient. This is termed "restitution" (Acts 3:19-23)--giving
back to the worthy the earthly privileges and blessings
lost in the first Adam, that, as the Lord's vine, humanity restored
may bear much fruit to God's praise. But be it noted,
this privilege of becoming the "root" is confined to the
Christ, Head and body, "elect according to the foreknowledge
of God through sanctification of the spirit and
the belief of the truth" during this Gospel age. (1 Pet. 1:2)
David and other worthies of the past (who died before the
"branch" was buried and became the "root") can never become
parts of the root; nor will the faithful of the Millennial
age. All, however, will be satisfied when they attain his
likeness, whether it be the earthly or the heavenly. Mankind
will be privileged to attain his likeness as the perfect man
Christ Jesus, the holy "branch," while the Church, his
[E141]
"bride," his "body," his faithful under-priests, who now
fill
up that which is behind of the sufferings of Christ and are
"planted with him in the likeness of his death," shall bear
his heavenly image. 1 Cor. 15:48,49; Heb. 11:39,40
"The Everlasting Father"
"His name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The Mighty God,
The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace." Isa. 9:6
We have already noted the propriety of the title "The
Mighty God" as applied to our Lord Jesus; and few will dispute
that he is indeed the Wonderful One of all the Heavenly
Father's family; none will dispute that he is a great
Counsellor or Teacher; or that, although his Kingdom is to
be introduced by a time of trouble and disturbance incident
to the death of present evil institutions, our Lord is
nevertheless the Prince of Peace--who will establish a sure
and lasting peace upon the only proper basis--righteousness
--conformity to the divine character and plan.
Now we come to the examination of the title, "The Everlasting
Father," and find it as appropriate and meaningful
as the others.
It does not, as some have surmised, contradict the multitudinous
scriptures which declare Jehovah to be the Father
everlasting--"the God and Father of our Lord Jesus
Christ," as Peter expresses it. (1 Pet. 1:3) On the contrary
the Scriptures clearly show a particular sense in which this
title will apply to our Lord at his second advent--that he
will be the Father of the human race regenerated during
the Millennium. Indeed, this title is merely the equivalent
of those we have just considered--the new "Lord" of David
and of mankind, the new "Root," the Second Adam,
merely signifies the Everlasting Father--the Father who
gives everlasting life.
Since our Lord purchased the world of mankind at the
cost of his own life, and since it is by virtue of that purchase
[E142]
that he became its Lord, its Restorer, its Life-giver, and
since the very central thought of the word father is life-giver,
our Lord could take no more appropriate name or title
than "Everlasting Father" to represent his relationship to
the world about to be regenerated--born again from the
dead by restitution, resurrection processes. The world's life
will come directly from the Lord Jesus, who, as we shall
shortly see, by divine arrangement bought it and paid Justice
the full price for it. Nevertheless, the restored world will, after
the restitution process is finished, recognize Jehovah as
the great original fountain of life and blessing, the author
of the great plan of salvation executed by our Lord Jesus--
the Grand Father and Over-Lord of All. 1 Cor. 15:24-28; 3:23;
Matt. 19:28
In full accord with what we have just seen is the prophetic
statement which for centuries has perplexed the wise
and the unwise, the scholar and commentator as well as the
student; namely:
Instead of Thy Fathers Shall Be Thy Children Whom
Thou Mayest Make Princes in All the Earth
--Psalm 45:16--
The patriarchs and prophets, and especially such as were
in the genealogical line upon which our Lord took hold,
through his mother Mary, were long honored with the title
of "fathers," progenitors of Messiah; just as the texts before
cited declare David to be the root out of which the Messiah,
the righteous Branch, should spring; and that the Messiah
should be David's son. But all this is to be changed, when
the Church, the body of Christ, shall be completed, and
joined to Jesus the Head in glory, and as the Everlasting
Father of mankind begin the world's regeneration. Those
previously the fathers will then be the children. Abraham,
Isaac, Jacob, David--none of these had life, in the proper
sense of that word: they were all members of the death-condemned
race. And when Jesus took hold upon our humanity,
[E143]
and became identified with the seed of Abraham and of
David, and accomplished the work of redemption, it applied
not only to the world in general, but as well to these,
his progenitors according to the flesh. He bought all, and
none can obtain life (complete, perfect, everlasting) except
through him. "He that hath the Son hath life, he that hath
not the Son shall not see life." (John 3:36) Hence, Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob and David and all the prophets, and
all the remainder of the world, must receive future and everlasting
life from Christ, or not at all; and outside of him is
only condemnation. Therefore it is true, that when in God's
due time they shall be awakened from death, it will be by
the great Life-giver, Jesus, who will thus be their Father or
Life-giver.
In this connection it is well to notice also that the Scriptures
clearly point out the Heavenly Father as the begetter
in the regeneration of the Church, the Bride of Christ. In
proof of this, note the Scriptural statements on this subject.
The Apostle Peter declares, "The God and Father of our
Lord Jesus Christ...hath begotten us." (1 Pet. 1:3)
The
Apostle John also declares that we are "begotten of God."
(1 John 5:18)
The Apostle Paul also declares, "To us there is
one God, the Father." (1 Cor. 8:6) He hath sent forth
his spirit
into our hearts, whereby we are enabled to cry unto him,
"Abba, Father." (Rom. 8:15) Our Lord Jesus testified to
the same thing, saying, after his resurrection, "I ascend to
my Father and to your Father, to my God and to your
God." (John 20:17) John's Gospel testifies to the same,
saying, "To as many as received him, to them gave he liberty
to become the sons of God," and declares of such that
they are "begotten, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh,
nor of the will of man, but of God." (John 1:12,13) The
Apostle James declares of the Father of lights that "Of his
own will begat he us with the Word of truth, that we should
be a kind of first-fruits of his creatures." Jas. 1:18
Indeed, everything respecting the Church indicates that
the faithful of this Gospel age are not the children of Christ,
but children of his Father, begotten of the Father's spirit
[E144]
and to the Father's nature, and intended to be "heirs of
God, joint-heirs with Jesus Christ our Lord, if so be that we
suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together."
Rom. 8:17
Our relationship to our Lord Jesus, on the contrary, is
specifically and repeatedly indicated to be that of brethren,
and not sons. Speaking of the Church the Apostle says, "He
is not ashamed to call them brethren," as had been prophetically
stated; "I will declare thy name unto my brethren;
in the midst of thy church will I sing praises unto
thee"; and again, "Behold I and the children [of God]
which God hath given me." These are the "many sons"
whom the Father is bringing to glory, under the lead of the
Captain of their Salvation, Christ Jesus, and as respects this
Church, it is again stated that our Lord Jesus, in his resurrection,
was "first-born among many brethren." Rom. 8:29;
Heb. 2:10-13
This great work of lifegiving to the world in general is deferred
until the Body of the Life-giver has been completed,
until the "brethren," with their Lord and Redeemer, shall
be received as sons of glory, and enter upon the work of restitution.
Even in the case of those of the world (the ancient
worthies), whose faith and loyalty to the divine will has already
been tested and approved, there can be no lifegiving
until the body of the great antitypical Moses (the Church)
has been fully completed (Acts 3:22,23), as it is written,
"They without us [the overcomers of the Gospel age,
the Body of the Anointed] shall not be made perfect"--
not inherit the earthly good things promised to them.
Heb. 11:39,40
From this standpoint of the redemption which is in
Christ Jesus, and in view of the authority or lordship of
earth lost by Adam and thus redeemed by Christ, purchased
by his precious blood, we see Christ's title to the office
of Life-giver and Father to all of the race of Adam who
will accept the blessings of restitution under the terms of the
New Covenant, and from this standpoint only can we see
how our Lord Jesus could be both the Root and the Offspring
[E145]
of David, both David's Son and David's Father,
David's Lord.
In this connection it may be proper to inquire, How
comes it that the Church of this Gospel Age, a part of the
world, "children of wrath even as others" (Eph. 2:3),
and
needing to experience as much as the others the forgiveness
of sins through the merit of the great atonement, is, in any
just sense, separate and distinct from the world, so that they
should be designated "sons of God," while the world should
be designated sons of the Life-giver, the Christ?
The distinction lies in the fact that the world not only
had its human life-rights purchased by the Lord Jesus, but
the obedient of mankind will have that purchased life restored
to them by him, through the gradual processes of the Millennial
age. The Church, on the contrary, does not receive the
restitution of human life which her Lord purchased for her.
The restitution life is merely reckoned to believers of this Gospel
age, in that they are justified (or made perfect, restored
as human beings) by faith--not actually. And this faith-reckoned
human perfection is for a specific purpose: namely,
that such may sacrifice the reckoned or imputed human life
and its rights and privileges in the divine service, and receive
in exchange therefor the hope of sharing the divine nature.
Earthly life and earthly blessings were lost by Adam, and
the same and no others were redeemed for men by our
Lord, and these and none others he will eventually bestow
during the times of restitution. But the Church, the body,
the Bride of Christ, is called out from mankind first, a specially
"elect" class, called to a "heavenly calling," a
"high
calling,"--to be joint-heir of Jesus Christ, her Lord and
Redeemer. As Jesus offered his perfect sacrifice, "the man
Christ Jesus," and was rewarded with the divine nature, so
the believers of this Gospel age are permitted to offer their
imperfect selves (justified or reckoned perfect through the
merit of the precious blood of Jesus) on God's altar; and so
doing are begotten of the spirit to be "new creatures," "sons
of the Highest," accepted as Christ's brethren--members of
the "royal priesthood" of which he is the Chief Priest.
[E146]
These are drawn of the Father, not drawn of the Son, as
will be the case with the world during the Millennium.
(Compare John 6:44and 12:32.) Those whom the
Father
draws to Christ he, as an elder brother, receives as "brethren,"
and assists in walking in his footsteps in the narrow
way of self-sacrifice, even unto death. Thus they may become
dead with him, and be reckoned as joint-sacrificers
with him, and thus be reckoned also as worthy to be joint-heirs
with him in the Kingdom and work which is to bless
the world and give eternal life to as many as will receive it.
These, we are distinctly told, are to "fill up that which is
behind of the afflictions of Christ"--to "suffer with him,
that they may also reign with him." (Col. 1:24; 2 Tim. 2:12)
Thus the position of the Church is particularly different
from that of the world in general, even as their calling is a
high calling, a heavenly calling, and even as its reward is to
be the divine nature. 2 Pet. 1:4
This is the great "mystery" or secret which, as the Apostle
declares, is the key, without which it is impossible to understand
the promises and prophecies of the divine Word.
(Col. 1:26) The heavenly Father purposed in himself the
creation of a human race, a little lower than the angels, of
the earth earthy, and adapted to the earth in its Paradisaic
condition: but he foreknew also the result of the fall, and its
opportunity for manifesting divine justice, divine love, divine
wisdom and divine power. As he forearranged that his
Only Begotten Son, the Logos, should be given the opportunity
of proving his fidelity to the Father and to the principles
of righteousness, by becoming man's Redeemer and
thus heir of all the riches of divine grace, and chief over all,
next to the Father, that in all things he might have the pre-eminence,
so he also designed that before the world of mankind
in general should be uplifted by their Redeemer, he
would make a selection, according to character and according
to faithfulness, of a "little flock," to be joint-heirs with
the Only Begotten One, and his associates in the Kingdom,
far above angels, principalities and powers, and every
name that is named.
[E147]
Accordingly, the apostle declares, we are "elect according
to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification
of the spirit." (1 Pet. 1:2) The Apostle Paul
corroborates the thought, saying, "Whom he did foreknow
he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that
he might be the first-born among many brethren." Further
he desired that the eyes of our understanding might be enlightened,
so that we "may know what is the hope of his
calling, and what the riches of his inheritance in the saints,
and what the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward
who believe." He declares that this mercy toward us came
without our having done aught to merit it; God, "when we
were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, and
hath raised us up together, and hath made us sit together in
heavenly places in Christ Jesus: that in the ages to come he
might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness
toward us, through Christ Jesus....For we are his workmanship,
created in Christ Jesus unto good works."
Eph. 1:17-19; 2:4-10
[E148]
GIVE STRENGTH, BLEST SAVIOR
"We seek not, Lord, for tongues of flame,
Or healing virtue's mystic aid;
But power thy Gospel to proclaim--
The balm for wounds that sin has made.
"Breathe on us, Lord; thy radiance pour
On all the wonders of the page
Where hidden lies the heavenly lore
That blessed our youth and guides our age.
"Grant skill each sacred theme to trace,
With loving voice and glowing tongue,
As when upon thy words of grace
The wondering crowds enraptured hung.
"Grant faith that treads the stormy deep
If but thy voice shall bid it come;
And zeal, that climbs the mountain steep,
To seek and bring the wanderer home.
"Give strength, blest Savior, in thy might;
Illuminate our hearts, and we,
Transformed into thine image bright,
Shall teach, and love, and live, like thee."
|